"Well if he's such a student of history, has he not understood that, you know, that's the one thing you don't do is engage in a land war in Afghanistan," [x] says of the president. "Alright? Because everyone who has tried over a thousand years of history has failed. And there are reasons for that. There are other ways to engage in Afghanistan without committing more troops."
[x] also described the situation around the resignation of Gen. Stanley McChrystal as "very comical."
- And no, it wasn't me! -
It wasn't someone from Code Pink or the Green Party either.
It was this guy, Chairman of the Republican Party.
I'm so confused. Nebraska has moved to the Big Ten and I don't know who to root for.
Oops, I mean, Democrats have replaced Republicans, and now I don't know whether the good guys support a military occupation or think having troops in central Asia ranks on the stupid ladder somewhere between bungie jumping without a cable and putting your hand on a hot stove to recover from frostbite.
What does it mean when the Bush/Cheney folks and the Obama/Biden folks both think that the head of the RNC is an idiot - when he happens to spout something with a hint of sensibility to it?
Help! There's been conference realignment but no one has printed the new media guides yet about what rivalries I'm supposed to care about and who's on which side.
Is Liz Cheney the new Adult in Charge? Has Bill Kristol been right about war all along?
DNC, please bring a little sanity to the episode:
It’s simply unconscionable that Michael Steele would undermine the morale of our troops when what they need is our support and encouragement. Michael Steele would do well to remember that we are not in Afghanistan by our own choosing, that we were attacked and that his words have consequences.
okie dokie, or do that...
No comments:
Post a Comment